The results with administering agents on Day 10 indicated that AT1R can suppress Col
The results with administering agents on Day 10 indicated that AT1R can suppress Col.X expression without the dominance of AT2R, because this was not expressed on Day 10. ANG, angiotensinogen; AT1R, angiotensin II type 1 receptor; ACE1, angiotensin-converting enzyme 1; AT2R, angiotensin II type 2 receptor. Open in a separate windows Fig. 2 Expression of Col.X in the ATDC5 cell collection treated with various brokers on Day 14. (A) Ang II downregulated the mRNA expression of Col.X in a concentration-dependent manner. (B) When cells were treated with Olmesartan, Ang II upregulated the mRNA expression of Col.X. (C) When cells were treated with PD123319, Ang II downregulated the mRNA expression of Col.X. (D) Western blot analysis showed that Ang II upregulated the expression of Col.X when cells were treated with Olmesartan and that Ang II downregulated the expression of Col.X when cells were treated with PD123319. (E) Western blotting detection of Col.X showed significant differences between treatments. The molar concentration ratios of antagonists to agonist were 2.32 Beta-Lipotropin (1-10), porcine (1.0 g/ml Olmesartan/1.0 g/ml AngII) and 1.77 (1.0 g/ml PD123319/1.0 g/ml AngII). * 0.05 between treatments. Col.X, type X collagen; Ang II, angiotensin II. Open in a separate windows Fig. 3 Expression of Beta-Lipotropin (1-10), porcine Col.X in the ATDC5 cell collection treated with Olmesartan on Day 14. Adding 0.1 and 1.0 g/ml Olmesartan made no significant changes to the mRNA expression of Col.X. Adding 10 g/ml Olmesartan upregulated the mRNA expression of Col.X. * 0.05 between treatments. Col.X, type X collagen. Open in a separate windows Fig. 4 Expression of Col.X in the ATDC5 cell collection treated with various brokers on Days 10 and 21. (A) When Beta-Lipotropin (1-10), porcine cells were treated with PD123319, Ang II downregulated the mRNA expression of Col.X on Day 10. When cells were treated with Olmesartan, adding Ang II made no significant changes in the mRNA expression of Col.X on Day 10. (B) When cells were treated with PD123319, adding Ang II made no significant changes to the mRNA expression of Col.X on Day 21. When cells were treated with Olmesartan, Ang II upregulated the mRNA expression of Col.X on Day 21. The molar concentration ratios of antagonists to agonist were 2.32 (1.0 g/ml Olmesartan/1.0 g/ml AngII) and 1.77 (1.0 g/ml PD123319/1.0 g/ml AngII). * 0.05 between treatments. Col.X, type X collagen; Ang II, angiotensin II. Open in a separate window Fig. 5 Expression of MMP13 and Runx2 in ATDC5 cells treated with numerous brokers on Day 14. (A) When cells were treated with Olmesartan, Ang II upregulated the mRNA expression of MMP13. (B) When cells were treated with PD123319, Ang II downregulated the mRNA expression of MMP13. (C) When cells were treated with Olmesartan, Ang II upregulated the mRNA expression of Runx2. (D) When cells were treated with PD123319, Ang II downregulated the mRNA expression of Runx2. The molar concentration ratios Beta-Lipotropin (1-10), porcine of antagonists to agonist were 2.32 (1.0 g/ml Olmesartan/1.0 g/ml AngII) and 1.77 (1.0 g/ml PD123319/1.0 g/ml AngII). * 0.05 between treatments. MMP13, matrix metalloproteinase 13; Runx 2, runt-related transcription factor 2; Ang II, angiotensin II. 4.?Conversation The presence of a specific local RAS has been reported in many tissues [3]. However, no statement has explained the role of a local RAS in the hypertrophic differentiation of chondrocytes. In a previous study, it was confirmed that AT1R is usually expressed in cultured osteoblasts [11]. Activating AT1R inhibited differentiation and bone formation in MMP17 osteoblasts of the rat calvaria [10]. Unlike AT1R, no significant function was found for AT2R in such target cells using a specific blocker [10]. However, AT2R has a reciprocal function to the function of AT1R in many other local and systemic RAS pathways [12]. For example, AT2R receptor exerts an antiproliferative effect in vascular clean muscle mass, counteracting the growth action of AT1R [13]. It was also reported that AT2R can bind directly to AT1R and thereby antagonizes its function [14]. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that AT2R Beta-Lipotropin (1-10), porcine could have a function reverse to that of AT1R in the.